People ex rel. Ross v. Irvin
This text of 188 A.D.2d 1087 (People ex rel. Ross v. Irvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because petitioner’s contention that his conviction was obtained in violation of CPL 310.10 could have been raised on direct appeal or on a motion pursuant to CPL article 440, habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy (see, People ex rel. Hall v LeFevre, 92 AD2d 956, [1088]*1088affd 60 NY2d 579; People ex rel. Nelson v Scully, 119 AD2d 709, lv denied 69 NY2d 602; People ex rel. Thomas v LeFevre, 102 AD2d 925, lv denied 63 NY2d 604). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 1087, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ross-v-irvin-nyappdiv-1992.