People ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert

204 A.D. 883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Although we think that the superintendent of the bureau of buildings has no power or discretion to refuse a permit on the ground that the proposed building violates a restrictive covenant, as this is not a matter for him to decide, yet, in view of the fact that this court has issued an injunction prohibiting the petitioner from constructing the building in question, we have decided to affirm this order, without prejudice to an application to be made after the vacation or termination of the injunction. Order affirmed, without costs. Blaekmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert, 204 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

204 A.D. 883 (People ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vandoros v. Hatzimichalis
131 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. Knowlton
476 N.E.2d 988 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
G. M. L. Land Corp. v. Foley
20 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
G. M. L. Land Corp. v. Foley
39 Misc. 2d 770 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)