People ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert

204 A.D. 883
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 204 A.D. 883 (People ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert, 204 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Although we think that the superintendent of the bureau of buildings has no power or discretion to refuse a permit on the ground that the proposed building violates a restrictive covenant, as this is not a matter for him to decide, yet, in view of the fact that this court has issued an injunction prohibiting the petitioner from constructing the building in question, we have decided to affirm this order, without prejudice to an application to be made after the vacation or termination of the injunction. Order affirmed, without costs. Blaekmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vandoros v. Hatzimichalis
131 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. Knowlton
476 N.E.2d 988 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
G. M. L. Land Corp. v. Foley
20 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
G. M. L. Land Corp. v. Foley
39 Misc. 2d 770 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rosevale-realty-co-v-kleinert-nyappdiv-1922.