People Ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. . Kleinert
143 N.E. 750, 237 N.Y. 580, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 874
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; Cardozo and Lehman, JJ., dissent on ground that appellant is within the protection of sections 23 and 24 of the Building Zone resolution and express no opinion upon the other questions suggested in the appellant's argument. Not voting: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. . Kleinert, 143 N.E. 750, 237 N.Y. 580, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 874 (N.Y. 1924).
143 N.E. 750 (People Ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. . Kleinert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. Knowlton
476 N.E.2d 988 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Rogers v. Building Department
208 Misc. 785 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
People v. Miller
106 N.E.2d 34 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
State Ex Rel. Landis v. Valz
157 So. 651 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Matter of Wulfsohn v. Burden
150 N.E. 120 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
New York Ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert
268 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1925)