People ex rel. Rosado v. New York State Parole Board
This text of 51 A.D.2d 753 (People ex rel. Rosado v. New York State Parole Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 19, 1975, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The right to a preliminary hearing as promptly as convenient after arrest, and to a revocation hearing within a reasonable time after the parolee is taken into custody, must be decided on a case by case basis (see Matter of McLucas v Oswald, 40 AD2d 311, app withdrawn 33 NY2d 639; see, also, Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471; cf. Barker v Wingo, 407 US 514). The record before us does not reveal any prejudice to petitioner as a result of the time lapse between his apprehension and the final hearing. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 A.D.2d 753, 379 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rosado-v-new-york-state-parole-board-nyappdiv-1976.