People ex rel. Romero v. Scully
This text of 204 A.D.2d 669 (People ex rel. Romero v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a habeas- corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered June 18, 1993, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner has failed to establish that departure from traditional and orderly proceedings is warranted in this case (see, People ex rel. Keitt v McMann, 18 NY2d 257). Thus, his [670]*670habeas corpus proceeding was properly dismissed (see, People ex rel. Benbow v Scully, 189 AD2d 844). Lawrence, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 669, 614 N.Y.S.2d 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-romero-v-scully-nyappdiv-1994.