People ex rel. Roman v. Higgins
186 A.D.2d 1044
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was properly denied. Because petitioner is not entitled to immediate release from custody, the remedy of habeas corpus is not available (see, People ex rel. Mendolia v Superintendent, 47 NY2d 779; People ex rel. Dell v Walker, 186 AD2d 1043 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Roman v. Higgins, 186 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
186 A.D.2d 1044 (People ex rel. Roman v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Ward v. Russi
219 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)