People ex rel. Rollins v. Board of County Commissioner

Colorado Court of Appeals

People ex rel. Rollins v. Board of County Commissioner

11 Colo. App. 137

CourtColorado Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 1898

DocketNo. 1347

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Colo. App. 137 (People ex rel. Rollins v. Board of County Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Rollins v. Board of County Commissioner, 11 Colo. App. 137 (Colo. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomson, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the judgment against the county was recovered by Albert W. Burrows, and by him transferred to this relator, Rollins. Eight of the warrants issued upon the judgment, amounting to $3,502.77, were paid. Otherwise the case is like the case of People ex rel. Reynolds against Rio Grande County, ante, p. 124, and requires the same disposition. The [138]*138judgment should he credited with the amount paid, and mandamus issued to compel the payment of the residue, in accordance with instructions contained in the opinion in the Reynolds case. The judgment in this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with those instructions.

Reversed.

Wilson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomson, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the judgment against the county was recovered by Albert W. Burrows, and by him transferred to this relator, Rollins. Eight of the warrants issued upon the judgment, amounting to $3,502.77, were paid. Otherwise the case is like the case of People ex rel. Reynolds against Rio Grande County, ante, p. 124, and requires the same disposition. The [138]*138judgment should he credited with the amount paid, and mandamus issued to compel the payment of the residue, in accordance with instructions contained in the opinion in the Reynolds case. The judgment in this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with those instructions.

Reversed.

Wilson, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Colo. App. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rollins-v-board-of-county-commissioner-coloctapp-1898.