People ex rel. Rohrbach v. Cochrane
This text of 242 A.D. 647 (People ex rel. Rohrbach v. Cochrane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peremptory mandamus order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P, J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents, being of opinion that whether there should be a “ chief ” of police as well as other members of a police force was, under the statute, left to the sound discretion of the village officials. There might be but one policeman necessary to police the village.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rohrbach-v-cochrane-nyappdiv-1934.