People Ex Rel. Rogalski v. Martin
52 N.E.2d 604, 291 N.Y. 729, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1830
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied. The only question of constitutional law considered and determined by the court was whether the refusal to permit the appellant to challenge by habeas corpus the validity of his conviction, was not a denial of due process. (See 290 N. Y. 751.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Rogalski v. Martin, 52 N.E.2d 604, 291 N.Y. 729, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1830 (N.Y. 1943).
52 N.E.2d 604 (People Ex Rel. Rogalski v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States ex rel. Rogalski v. Jackson
146 F.2d 251 (Second Circuit, 1944)