People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Warden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Warden

49 A.D.2d 523, 370 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10370

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 523 (People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Rodriguez v. Warden, 49 A.D.2d 523, 370 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered March 13, 1974, dismissing, after a hearing, relator’s writ of habeas corpus, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, and the matter remanded for a new hearing. At issue is whether relator was properly credited with "good time” and whether certain "good time” initially credited was properly revoked. The documentation at the first hearing was incomplete to the extent that the particulars of relator’s sentencing history were not presented to the court. We have, accordingly, in the interest of justice, remanded the matter for a new hearing. Concur— Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered March 13, 1974, dismissing, after a hearing, relator’s writ of habeas corpus, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, and the matter remanded for a new hearing. At issue is whether relator was properly credited with "good time” and whether certain "good time” initially credited was properly revoked. The documentation at the first hearing was incomplete to the extent that the particulars of relator’s sentencing history were not presented to the court. We have, accordingly, in the interest of justice, remanded the matter for a new hearing. Concur— Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 523, 370 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rodriguez-v-warden-nyappdiv-1975.