People ex rel. Rodriguez v. New York Board of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Rodriguez v. New York Board of Parole

53 A.D.2d 622, 385 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13318

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1976·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 5, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner asserts that he was not accorded his right to a prompt final parole revocation hearing. After considering all of the facts and circumstances involved herein, we hold that the delay was not unreasonable in view of its length and the absence of any showing of real prejudice. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 5, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner asserts that he was not accorded his right to a prompt final parole revocation hearing. After considering all of the facts and circumstances involved herein, we hold that the delay was not unreasonable in view of its length and the absence of any showing of real prejudice. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Rodriguez v. New York Board of Parole, 53 A.D.2d 622, 385 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

53 A.D.2d 622 (People ex rel. Rodriguez v. New York Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related