People ex rel. Rochester Whist Club v. Hamilton

17 Misc. 11, 39 N.Y.S. 531, 1 Liquor Tax Rep. 35
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 Misc. 11 (People ex rel. Rochester Whist Club v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Rochester Whist Club v. Hamilton, 17 Misc. 11, 39 N.Y.S. 531, 1 Liquor Tax Rep. 35 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

Davy, J.

This is a proceeding by certiorari to review the decision of the county treasurer of Monroe county in refusing to issue [12]*12to the relator a liquor-tax certificate, as provided in chapter 112 of the Laws of 1896, commonly known as the Raines Liquor Tax Law. .

The reasons stated in the return for refusing the .certificate are, that the relator is a corporation organized to promote social intercourse among its members and to provide them with the conveniences of'a clubhouse, and that it cannot engage in the business of trafficking in liquors. It is hardly necessary in this case to discuss the discretionary power that is vested in the county treasurer under the statute, to grant or refuse a liquor tax certificate. I am inclined to think, however, that if any .person who applies for such a certificate brings himself squarely within the-terms of the law by complying with all the statutory preliminaries, that the certificate cannot legally be withheld; but as these proceedings are instituted in a friendly manner and for the purpose of obtaining a judicial construction of the statute pertaining to the relator’s legal right to dispense liquors to its members, the only question, therefore, which I deem it necessary to consider upon this application is, whether the relator is required, under the provisions of said act, .to take out a liquor tax license.

It is conceded that the relator is a bona fide club and was duly incorporated on the 10th day of January, 1884, having among its objects the promotion of social enjoyment and recreation among its members; such as the practice and cultivation of the game of whist and other innocent amusements. The organization has followed the familiar rule -of adopting a constitution and by-laws which set forth the object of the society and the qualifications for . membership and the number and character of its officers.. These, • together with its charter, constitute its fundamental law, and are the source and limit of its authority to transact business. The relator rents and furnishes a large house which is located at No. 40 North Fitzhugh street, which contains parlors, a reading-room, billiard and card-rooms, a dining-room, kitchen and storeroom, and a room in which liquors and cigars are kept and dispensed to the members of the club only upon their oral or written request, at a price fixed therefor by the .house committee, for which the members ordering the same may pay cash, or have it charged and pay therefor, monthly. This fund, together with the annual dues and initiation fees, are used in paying for the liquors and other supplies which are consumed by its members, and in defraying the general expenses of the club.

[13]*13The membership of the club is limited and consists of resident and nonresident members, and no person can be admitted as a men>. ber unless he is twenty-one years of age and his name has been proposed by two members of the society who are in good and regular standing. The rules also require that his name, with the names of those who proposed him for membership, shall, be posted upon the bulletin board of the club'for at-least two weeks before he can be elected. At the election two negative votes or black balls are sufficient to exclude any candidate. Members are divided into two classes, resident and nonresident. The initiation fees are, $20 for resident members, and $10 for nonresident members, and the annual dues are, $32 per year for resident members, and $10 per year for nonresident members. The constitution also provides that each member shall have the right to entertain a friend not residing in the city of Rochester to the privileges of the club for the space of two weeks, .upon recording the name and residence of such friend in the visitors’ book, together with his own, and producing from an officer of the club a card of invitation. A member at whose request an invitation is given to a guest is held responsible to the club for all obligations of such guest. The club-house is open to its members at all times, but no games of any kind are permitted to be played on Sunday or any other time for money. Many of its members make the club-house their home, except for lodging,' and they spend much of their time when not engaged in business in its parlors and reading-room, and in playing and enjoying the familiar game known as whist.

The committee having the management of the organization usually orders, from time to time, such quantities of provisions and liquors, as will meet the demand of the individual members of the club. The food is served in the dining-room and the liquors are dispensed to its members by its steward and other servants at prices fixed by the officers of the club. The prices for liquors are intended to cover the actual cost of the articles furnished and the expenses incurred in serving them. The money so received is paid into the treasury, and is again used for replenishing the stock, which are in like manner dispensed to the_ members. It is evident that if the members only paid into the treasury the cost price of the liquors, there would be no fund to pay the servants and other outlays necessarily incurred in dispensing them, and the deficiency would have to be made good out of the funds received from initiation fees and annual dues., The plan adopted is a simple method of [14]*14assessing each member the cost price of the liquors he-consumes, and, in addition thereto, a sufficient sum to pay the expenses incurred in serving them. The relator has pursued this method of supplying liquors and refreshments to its -members ever since its • organization, and its right seems never to have been questioned or' challenged before; -

Black, in his work on Intoxicating Liquors, says, Whether or not a social club, such as are very, common in all large cities, may lawfully furnish liquors to its members, as a .part of the entertainment which it provides for them, without procuring a license or paying a tax as a retailer, is a question which has provoked-great discussion of late years, .and upon which the authorities are by no means harmonious.” After referring-to the authorities in the different States upon the subject, he reaches the conclusion that the intent must govern,' and that if the organization is a bona fide club and conducted, in good faith, with a, limited and selected membership, really owning its property in common,, and formed for social, litérary, artistic or. other purposes, to which the furnishing of liquors to its members would be merely incidental — in the samé way and to the same extent that the supplying of dinners or daily papers might be, then it cannot be considered within either the purpose or letter of the law.”

Notwithstanding the conflict of authorities in other States upon the subject, I think that the question is no longer a' doubtful one in this State: The recent -decision of the Court of Appeals, in the case of The People v. Adelphi Club, 149 N. Y. 5, holds that a bona fide social club, regularly organized - under the statute for legitimate purposes, to which the furnishing of liquors to its members is merely incidental, and having a.limited and selected membership, does not constitute a sale within the meaning of the Excise A.ct of 1892. Hothing-can be said that will throw any additional light upon the question under consideration than what is stated in the very interesting and exhaustive opinion'of Judge Haight, in the Adelphi." Club case, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mollendorf v. State
173 P.2d 519 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1946)
People ex rel. Smith v. Foster
27 Misc. 576 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
People ex rel. Hartigan v. Macy
1 Liquor Tax Rep. 82 (Columbia County Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Misc. 11, 39 N.Y.S. 531, 1 Liquor Tax Rep. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rochester-whist-club-v-hamilton-nysupct-1896.