People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Company v. . Woodbury
112 N.E. 1055, 217 N.Y. 670, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1442
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Seabury, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Company v. . Woodbury, 112 N.E. 1055, 217 N.Y. 670, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1442 (N.Y. 1916).
112 N.E. 1055 (People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Company v. . Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.