People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Company v. . Woodbury
112 N.E. 1055, 217 N.Y. 670, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1442
This text of 112 N.E. 1055 (People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Company v. . Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Company v. . Woodbury, 112 N.E. 1055, 217 N.Y. 670, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1442 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Seabury, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 N.E. 1055, 217 N.Y. 670, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rochester-telephone-company-v-woodbury-ny-1916.