People ex rel. Robinson v. Graham

68 A.D.3d 1706, 892 N.Y.2d 692
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. “The contention of petitioner that he is entitled to immediate release because the indictment was jurisdictionally defective could have been raised on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion, and thus habeas corpus relief does not lie” (People ex rel. Lewis v Graham, 57 AD3d 1508, 1508-1509 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 705 [2009]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions also could have been raised on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion, and thus habeas corpus relief is unavailable (see generally People ex rel. Lanfair v Corcoran, 60 AD3d 1351 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 714 [2009]; People ex rel. Mills v Poole, 55 AD 3d 1289 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 712 [2008]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Smith, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Robinson v. Graham, 68 A.D.3d 1706, 892 N.Y.2d 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 1706 (People ex rel. Robinson v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LEWIS, NATHAN v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
MORSE, SCOTT v. BERBARY, SUPERINTENDENT, COLLINS, JAMES L.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012