People ex rel. Roberts v. Dannhauser

2024 NY Slip Op 04537
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 2024
Docket2024-09014
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 04537 (People ex rel. Roberts v. Dannhauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Roberts v. Dannhauser, 2024 NY Slip Op 04537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People ex rel. Roberts v Dannhauser (2024 NY Slip Op 04537)
People ex rel. Roberts v Dannhauser
2024 NY Slip Op 04537
Decided on September 24, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 24, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LILLIAN WAN
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2024-09014

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Samuel Roberts, on behalf of A.C., petitioner,

v

Jess Dannhauser, etc., respondent.


Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Samuel Roberts pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott, Joseph M. DiPietro, and Timothy Shortt of counsel), for respondent.



Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release A.C. upon her own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Queens County Indictment No. 72031/2024. Application by the petitioner to seal the papers filed in connection with the application for a writ of habeas corpus.

ORDERED that the application is denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).

IANNACCI, J.P., MALTESE, WAN and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 04537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-roberts-v-dannhauser-nyappdiv-2024.