People ex rel. Riverside Drive Estates, Inc. v. Carmichael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Riverside Drive Estates, Inc. v. Carmichael

246 A.D. 867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 867 (People ex rel. Riverside Drive Estates, Inc. v. Carmichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Riverside Drive Estates, Inc. v. Carmichael, 246 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from judgment reducing assessments on respondent’s real premises. The issues were overvaluation and inequality. The official referee found upon the parties’ stipulation that other property in the city was assessed at eighty-four per cent of its full value. He also found that respondent’s properties were overvalued and reduced the assessments accordingly. The evidence sustains these findings. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment reducing assessments on respondent’s real premises. The issues were overvaluation and inequality. The official referee found upon the parties’ stipulation that other property in the city was assessed at eighty-four per cent of its full value. He also found that respondent’s properties were overvalued and reduced the assessments accordingly. The evidence sustains these findings. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-riverside-drive-estates-inc-v-carmichael-nyappdiv-1936.