People ex rel. Rivera v. Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Rivera v. Edwards

265 A.D.2d 512, 696 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 512 (People ex rel. Rivera v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Rivera v. Edwards, 265 A.D.2d 512, 696 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated October 9, 1998, as denied his application for the issuance of a writ.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

While the instant appeal was pending, the petitioner was released from Otisville Correctional Facility. Accordingly, the petitioner’s habeas corpus proceeding challenging the legality of his detention must be dismissed as academic (see, People ex rel. DeFlumer v Strack, 85 NY2d 966; People ex rel. Alexander S. v Bennett, 251 AD2d 690; People ex rel. Jose S. v Bennett, 251 AD2d 689). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated October 9, 1998, as denied his application for the issuance of a writ.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

While the instant appeal was pending, the petitioner was released from Otisville Correctional Facility. Accordingly, the petitioner’s habeas corpus proceeding challenging the legality of his detention must be dismissed as academic (see, People ex rel. DeFlumer v Strack, 85 NY2d 966; People ex rel. Alexander S. v Bennett, 251 AD2d 690; People ex rel. Jose S. v Bennett, 251 AD2d 689). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 512, 696 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rivera-v-edwards-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack