People ex rel. Rickenbacker v. Bednosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Rickenbacker v. Bednosky

297 A.D.2d 690, 747 N.Y.2d 188, 747 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 690 (People ex rel. Rickenbacker v. Bednosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Rickenbacker v. Bednosky, 297 A.D.2d 690, 747 N.Y.2d 188, 747 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

The appeals from the decision and the calendar clerk’s entry must be dismissed because no appeals lie therefrom (see CPLR 7011).

In any event, we have reviewed the record and agree with [691]*691the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on an appeal from any judgment which may have been or may be entered in this proceeding (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). In light of our dismissal of the appeals, counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is denied as academic. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeals from the decision and the calendar clerk’s entry must be dismissed because no appeals lie therefrom (see CPLR 7011).

In any event, we have reviewed the record and agree with [691]*691the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on an appeal from any judgment which may have been or may be entered in this proceeding (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). In light of our dismissal of the appeals, counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is denied as academic. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 A.D.2d 690, 747 N.Y.2d 188, 747 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rickenbacker-v-bednosky-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack