People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer

27 A.D.3d 499, 809 N.Y.S.2d 917

This text of 27 A.D.3d 499 (People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer, 27 A.D.3d 499, 809 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In a proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 33.15 (a), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated November 30, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The issue raised on this appeal has been rendered academic as a result of our determination on a prior appeal (see Matter of Ricardo H., 17 AD3d 464, 465 [2005]). The matter does not warrant invoking the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
In re Ricardo H.
17 A.D.3d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.3d 499, 809 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ricardo-h-v-seltzer-nyappdiv-2006.