People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer

27 A.D.3d 499, 809 N.Y.S.2d 917

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 2006·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 33.15 (a), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated November 30, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The issue raised on this appeal has been rendered academic as a result of our determination on a prior appeal (see Matter of Ricardo H., 17 AD3d 464, 465 [2005]). The matter does not warrant invoking the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 33.15 (a), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated November 30, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The issue raised on this appeal has been rendered academic as a result of our determination on a prior appeal (see Matter of Ricardo H., 17 AD3d 464, 465 [2005]). The matter does not warrant invoking the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer, 27 A.D.3d 499, 809 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

27 A.D.3d 499 (People ex rel. Ricardo H. v. Seltzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related