People ex rel. Reynoso v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Reynoso v. Sullivan

159 A.D.2d 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 744 (People ex rel. Reynoso v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Reynoso v. Sullivan, 159 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Buell, J.), entered October 30, 1987, which dismissed the writ.

Ordered that the order and judgment (one paper) is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel (see, People ex rel. Williams v La Vallee, 19 NY2d 238) that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Buell, J.), entered October 30, 1987, which dismissed the writ.

Ordered that the order and judgment (one paper) is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel (see, People ex rel. Williams v La Vallee, 19 NY2d 238) that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-reynoso-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack