People ex rel. Reynolds v. Barnett

3 Abb. N. Cas. 510
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Abb. N. Cas. 510 (People ex rel. Reynolds v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Reynolds v. Barnett, 3 Abb. N. Cas. 510 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Opinion

Hardin, J.

The consent and stipulation given before the justices, were a waiver of the relator’s right to have the first justice associated sit. It is competent for a party to waive a statutory or even constitutional [512]*512provision made in Ms favor in civil proceedings. These proceedings .are not criminal (4 Lansing, 208; 5 Denio, 98; 24 How. Pr. 514).

The motion to supersede the writ is granted and the writ set aside, and the proceedings remitted to the court of sessions with ten dollars costs.

The appellant appealed from that order to the general term of the fourth department, where the order of special term was affirmed with costs at the January term, 1878.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stowell v. Overseers
5 Denio 98 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
People v. Boardman
24 How. Pr. 512 (New York Supreme Court, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Abb. N. Cas. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-reynolds-v-barnett-nysupct-1878.