People ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves

255 A.D. 921, 7 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5857
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 255 A.D. 921 (People ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves, 255 A.D. 921, 7 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a final determination of the State Tax Commission affirming an annual corporation franchise tax assessed against the relator under article 9-A of the Tax Law for the tax year beginning November 1, 1936. Article 9-A of the Tax Law imposes an annual franchise tax upon corporations measured by entire net income. Subdivision 3 of section 208 of that article (as amd. by Laws of 1935, chap. 745) provides: “ The term ‘ entire net income ’ means total net income from all sources, without deduction of * * * (6) interest on indebtedness to stockholders or shareholders, or members of their immediate families, except interest on moneys borrowed for ordinary expenses of the corporation. * * *.” The relator is a New York corporation engaged in the business of mining salt in Livingston county, N. Y. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of the International Salt Company, a New Jersey corporation. The International Salt Company owned all of the capital stock of the relator and it pledged that stock, with other property, to the Chemical Bank and Trust Company as trustee as security for an issue of International Salt .Company’s bonds. The indenture provided that the salt company was “ to retain all the authority, powers, rights and privileges belonging or incident to the stock and bonds hereby pledged * * * or to the ownership thereof.” They provided that unless or until there was a default that all securities pledged should remain in the name of the salt company. Under the facts in the case and the statute above quoted, the International Salt Company was a stockholder of the relator. The statute is not unconstitutional so far as the relator is concerned. The final determination of the State Tax Commission should be confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Determination unanimously confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., MeNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Markt & Hammacher Co.
258 A.D. 363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
People ex rel. Glauber, Inc. v. Graves
258 A.D. 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 921, 7 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-retsof-mining-co-v-graves-nyappdiv-1938.