People ex rel. Renfroe v. Warden

49 A.D.3d 571, 855 N.Y.2d 371

This text of 49 A.D.3d 571 (People ex rel. Renfroe v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Renfroe v. Warden, 49 A.D.3d 571, 855 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The determination of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Lifson, Florio and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 571, 855 N.Y.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-renfroe-v-warden-nyappdiv-2008.