People Ex Rel. Redford v. City of Burley

388 P.2d 996, 86 Idaho 519, 1964 Ida. LEXIS 204
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1964
Docket9316
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 388 P.2d 996 (People Ex Rel. Redford v. City of Burley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Redford v. City of Burley, 388 P.2d 996, 86 Idaho 519, 1964 Ida. LEXIS 204 (Idaho 1964).

Opinion

KNUDSON, Chief Justice.

By this action plaintiff-appellant challenges the validity of an ordinance (No. 667) of defendant-respondent municipal corporation which by its provisions purports to annex an area lying immediately north of the north boundary of respondent city. All of the facts material to a decision of the legal questions involved were submitted to the trial court by written stipulation filed July 19, 1962. Thereafter and on the same date respondent filed its motion for summary judgment. On July 23, 1962, appellant filed motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted respondent’s said motion and from the judgment entered this appeal is taken.

*521 The stipulated facts pertinent to a consideration of the issues presented are:

(1)Overland Avenue, also known as State Highway No. 27, extends north and south through the approximate center of Burley and also through the approximate center of the area in controversy. Prior to the effective date of said ordinance the northerly boundary line of respondent city extended in a northeasterly and southwesterly direction along the south bound-a distance of approximately 900 ary line of the Snake River for feet easterly from the center line of Overland Avenue and for 1000 feet westerly from said center line.
(2) The area described in said ordinance, as shown by the following sketch, includes a part of the bed or channel of the Snake River which is covered by the waters of said river. The river bed referred to constitutes the southern portion of said area and is spanned by a two-lane bridge extending along Overland Avenue, at which point the river is over 500 feet wide.
(3) That the center of Snake River, in the area involved, constitutes the boundary line between Cassia County on the south and Minidoka County on the north.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anne Arundel County v. City of Annapolis
721 A.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)
Hendricks v. City of Nampa
456 P.2d 262 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1969)
Lehrer v. Wallace
24 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 P.2d 996, 86 Idaho 519, 1964 Ida. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-redford-v-city-of-burley-idaho-1964.