People ex rel. Reardon v. Byrne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Reardon v. Byrne

256 A.D. 881, 9 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 881 (People ex rel. Reardon v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Reardon v. Byrne, 256 A.D. 881, 9 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an “Order and Judgment,” granted at a Special Term of the Supreme Court and entered in Rensselaer county clerk’s office reducing the assessment on property of relators for the year 1938. The property was assessed for the year in question, land, $3,300; buildings, $5,700; full value, $9,000. The judgment declares the assessment erroneous by reason of overvaluation to the extent of $1,300. By the decision on which the judgment was entered it was found that irrespective of the property in question the assessed valuation of real estate generally, upon the assessment roll for the year 1938 is at the rate of seventy-eight per cent of the actual or market value. Upon this basis the judgment directed that the assessment of relators’ property should be $6,006. There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an “Order and Judgment,” granted at a Special Term of the Supreme Court and entered in Rensselaer county clerk’s office reducing the assessment on property of relators for the year 1938. The property was assessed for the year in question, land, $3,300; buildings, $5,700; full value, $9,000. The judgment declares the assessment erroneous by reason of overvaluation to the extent of $1,300. By the decision on which the judgment was entered it was found that irrespective of the property in question the assessed valuation of real estate generally, upon the assessment roll for the year 1938 is at the rate of seventy-eight per cent of the actual or market value. Upon this basis the judgment directed that the assessment of relators’ property should be $6,006. There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 881, 9 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-reardon-v-byrne-nyappdiv-1939.