People ex rel. Rardin v. Rardin
This text of 151 Ill. App. 84 (People ex rel. Rardin v. Rardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction for bastardy. The evidence clearly justifies the finding of the jury, and the only error assigned relates to the action of the court in giving the second instruction tendered by appellee. While the instruction is not a model, it has been considered and held not to he misleading in N. Chicago City Ry. Co. v. Gastka, 27 Ill. App. 518, aErmed in 128 Ill. 613. and also in W. Chicago St. R. R. Co. v. Loftus, 83 Ill. App. 192.
In view of the uncontradicted evidence in the record tending to establish the guilt of the defendant, the instruction could not have operated to his prejudice.
The judgment is aErmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 Ill. App. 84, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rardin-v-rardin-illappct-1909.