People ex rel. Ransom v. Onondaga C. P.

3 Wend. 331
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

An execution is an entire thing. If a plaintiff in a judgment issues an execution, and directs an amount less than the whole sum to which he is entitled to be levied, he cannot subsequently issue another execution for the balance. It cannot be permitted that a defendant should thus be harrassed by repeated executions. The common pleas erred in denying the motion of the relator, wherefore, let an alternative mandamus issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Ransom v. Onondaga C. P., 3 Wend. 331 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

3 Wend. 331 (People ex rel. Ransom v. Onondaga C. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. Fleming
175 Misc. 408 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
Hackfeld v. Ludovico
10 Haw. 348 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1896)
Bank of Sheboygan v. Trilling
43 N.W. 830 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)
Todd v. . Botchford
86 N.Y. 517 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Todd v. Botchford
31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 495 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)