People ex rel. Quinones v. Fogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Quinones v. Fogg

56 A.D.2d 584, 392 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 584 (People ex rel. Quinones v. Fogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Quinones v. Fogg, 56 A.D.2d 584, 392 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered January 15, 1976, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted to the extent that the Parole Board is directed to conduct an immediate preliminary violation hearing and, if necessary, a final violation hearing, pursuant to 7 NYCRR 1920.20 (d). No fact findings were presented for review. Petitioner is entitled to the hearings requested pursuant to the regulations of the Department of Correctional Services, which were in effect at the time of his last conviction. Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered January 15, 1976, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted to the extent that the Parole Board is directed to conduct an immediate preliminary violation hearing and, if necessary, a final violation hearing, pursuant to 7 NYCRR 1920.20 (d). No fact findings were presented for review. Petitioner is entitled to the hearings requested pursuant to the regulations of the Department of Correctional Services, which were in effect at the time of his last conviction. Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 584, 392 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-quinones-v-fogg-nyappdiv-1977.