People Ex Rel. Purvis v. La Vallee

221 N.E.2d 461, 18 N.Y.2d 753, 274 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1069
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*755 Order affirmed. Appellant who pleaded not guilty and stood trial on the criminal charge was not prejudiced by the failure to notify him at his arraignment pursuant to then section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see People v. Porter, 14 N Y 2d 785). The refusal of the Appellate Division to assign counsel in that court on the argument of the appeal in this proceeding was erroneous, hut it resulted in no prejudice to relator since he was thereafter in fact represented on the appeal by an attorney.

C oncur: Chief J udge Desmond and J udge s Fuld, VaN Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergak and Keatikg.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Purvis v. La Vallee, 221 N.E.2d 461, 18 N.Y.2d 753, 274 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1069 (N.Y. 1966).

221 N.E.2d 461 (People Ex Rel. Purvis v. La Vallee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related