People Ex Rel. Pullman Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitzgerald

302 N.E.2d 429, 14 Ill. App. 3d 247, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1830
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedAugust 8, 1973
Docket56595
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 302 N.E.2d 429 (People Ex Rel. Pullman Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Pullman Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitzgerald, 302 N.E.2d 429, 14 Ill. App. 3d 247, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1830 (Ill. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE DIERINGER

delivered the opinion of the court:

This mandamus proceeding was brought in the Circuit Court of Cook County to compel issuance of building permits for construction of an automobile service station on the southeast corner of Division and Wells Streets in Chicago, Illinois. The site had been zoned Cl — 4, and a service station was a proper use under that classification. However, the site has been designated for residential uses by the Chicago-Orleans Slum and Blighted Area Redemption Project, an urban renewal plan enacted by the city of Chicago, and no building permits were issued.

The trial court granted a writ of mandamus compelling the Commissioner of the Department of Buildings of the City of Chicago to issue the building permits, and the commissioner appeals from that judgment.

The issue on appeal relates to whether a building permit may be issued in accordance with the zoning ordinance when there is a conflict with the subsequently enacted urban renewal plan.

The appellee has not filed any briefs in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 341 (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 110A, par. 341). This court may determine the case on its merits or may reverse because of the failure of the appellee to comply with the supreme court rule in its sound discretion. (Shinn v. County Board of School Trustees (1970), 130 Ill. App.2d 908; People v. Spinelli (1967), 83 Ill.App.2d 391; Timmerman v. Wilson (1966), 74 Ill.App.2d 224.) Inasmuch as the appellee has abandoned its case, we see no reason to go into the merits. We have therefore decided to reverse pro forma.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Cook County is reversed.

Reversed.

BURMAN, P. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. McClerren
554 N.E.2d 776 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1990)
In Re Adoption of Daly
344 N.E.2d 501 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
Cowhey v. Tator
344 N.E.2d 501 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
L & Lc Trucking Co. v. Jack Freeman Trucking Co.
343 N.E.2d 716 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
People Ex Rel. Holland v. Halprin
332 N.E.2d 501 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Hawkins v. Richardson
331 N.E.2d 201 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Alliance Engineering & Research Corp. v. Gualtieri
319 N.E.2d 305 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
City of Danville v. Reffett
314 N.E.2d 692 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
Georges v. Mallare
310 N.E.2d 754 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 N.E.2d 429, 14 Ill. App. 3d 247, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-pullman-bank-trust-co-v-fitzgerald-illappct-1973.