People ex rel. Pugach v. Mancusi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Pugach v. Mancusi

33 A.D.2d 974, 307 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 974 (People ex rel. Pugach v. Mancusi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Pugach v. Mancusi, 33 A.D.2d 974, 307 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law and facts and so much of the writs of habeas corpus which seek to have the sentences for burglary and maiming to run concurrently, dismissed. Memorandum: Upon conviction of burglary, second degree, and maiming, relator was sentenced to terms of imprisonment to run consecutively. He contends that he was subjected to double punishment in violation of section 1938 of the Penal Law. The sentences were properly imposed (Penal Law, §§ 406, 2190, subd. 4). (Appeal from certain parts of judgment of Wyoming County Court sustaining writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator for further proceedings.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law and facts and so much of the writs of habeas corpus which seek to have the sentences for burglary and maiming to run concurrently, dismissed. Memorandum: Upon conviction of burglary, second degree, and maiming, relator was sentenced to terms of imprisonment to run consecutively. He contends that he was subjected to double punishment in violation of section 1938 of the Penal Law. The sentences were properly imposed (Penal Law, §§ 406, 2190, subd. 4). (Appeal from certain parts of judgment of Wyoming County Court sustaining writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator for further proceedings.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 974, 307 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-pugach-v-mancusi-nyappdiv-1970.