People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Company v. . Ludwig
114 N.E. 1079, 219 N.Y. 586, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 914
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 218 N. Y. 540.)
Motion granted to the extent of inserting therein the following recital: “ Upon the argument of this case in the Court of Appeals the counsel for the appellant Mecca Realty • Company presented and argued the following point: ‘The ordinance is in conflict with sections 1 and 6 of Article 1 of the Constitution of the State of New York and with the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. ’ ”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Company v. . Ludwig, 114 N.E. 1079, 219 N.Y. 586, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 914 (N.Y. 1916).
114 N.E. 1079 (People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Company v. . Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ranieri v. Argust
254 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)