People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Company v. . Ludwig

114 N.E. 1079, 219 N.Y. 586, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 914
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 218 N. Y. 540.)

Motion granted to the extent of inserting therein the following recital: “ Upon the argument of this case in the Court of Appeals the counsel for the appellant Mecca Realty • Company presented and argued the following point: ‘The ordinance is in conflict with sections 1 and 6 of Article 1 of the Constitution of the State of New York and with the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. ’ ”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Company v. . Ludwig, 114 N.E. 1079, 219 N.Y. 586, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 914 (N.Y. 1916).

114 N.E. 1079 (People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Company v. . Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ranieri v. Argust
254 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)