People ex rel. Potterton v. Potterton
This text of 169 Misc. 404 (People ex rel. Potterton v. Potterton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to section 70 of the Domestic Relations Law, directed to respondent to appear before this court with the child of the parties hereto, aged three years. They live in Utica, N. Y. Section 1239, subdivision 2, of the Civil Practice Act is cited as authority for the application. The section seems to me to indicate that this writ must be made returnable in the county of the confinement and not in the county where the convenience of the relator and his witnesses will best be served.
Writ signed, but returnable in Oneida county, N. Y.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 Misc. 404, 7 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-potterton-v-potterton-nysupct-1938.