People ex rel. Potterton v. Potterton

169 Misc. 404, 7 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2036
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Nova, J.

Application for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to section 70 of the Domestic Relations Law, directed to respondent to appear before this court with the child of the parties hereto, aged three years. They live in Utica, N. Y. Section 1239, subdivision 2, of the Civil Practice Act is cited as authority for the application. The section seems to me to indicate that this writ must be made returnable in the county of the confinement and not in the county where the convenience of the relator and his witnesses will best be served.

Writ signed, but returnable in Oneida county, N. Y.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Potterton v. Potterton, 169 Misc. 404, 7 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2036 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1938).

169 Misc. 404 (People ex rel. Potterton v. Potterton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bridgewater v. Bridgewater
82 Misc. 2d 812 (NYC Family Court, 1975)
Morton v. Morton
79 Misc. 2d 915 (NYC Family Court, 1974)