People Ex Rel. Posada-Osorio v. Hammock
This text of 447 N.E.2d 1282 (People Ex Rel. Posada-Osorio v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for determination of whether the petitioner was within the convenience and practical control of the New York parole authorities while in Federal custody (see People ex rel. Vasquez v New York State Bd. of Parole, 58 NY2d 981 [decided herewith]; People ex rel. Gonzales v Dalsheim, 52 NY2d 9). Although parole revocation proceedings had been commenced prior to the Gonzales decision, no final judgment had been issued against petitioner before Gonzales was handed down; Gonzales thus controls.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.
*981 Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 N.E.2d 1282, 58 N.Y.2d 978, 460 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-posada-osorio-v-hammock-ny-1983.