People ex rel. Pezzullo v. Arteta

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2026
Docket2026-04951
StatusPublished

This text of People ex rel. Pezzullo v. Arteta (People ex rel. Pezzullo v. Arteta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Pezzullo v. Arteta, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People ex rel. Pezzullo v Arteta - 2026 NY Slip Op 03655
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People ex rel. Pezzullo v Arteta

2026 NY Slip Op 03655

June 9, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Christopher Pezzullo, on behalf of Yashua T. Martin, petitioner,

v

Paul Arteta, etc., respondent.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on June 9, 2026

2026-04951

Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.

Barry E. Warhit

Laurence L. Love

Susan Quirk, JJ.

Michael E. Davis, Goshen, NY (Christopher Pezzullo pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass and Robert C. McIver of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Yashua T. Martin upon his own recognizance upon Orange County Indictment Nos. 150/2026 and 70410/2026.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, Yashua T. Martin was charged with qualifying offenses under CPL 510.10(4)(t). Here, the People established that he was charged with a felony offense that "arose from conduct occurring" while he was released on his own recognizance on separate felony charges (CPL 510.10[4][t]). Accordingly, the charged crimes in this case were qualifying offenses under CPL 510.10(4)(t).

CHAMBERS, J.P., WARHIT, LOVE and QUIRK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People ex rel. Pezzullo v. Arteta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-pezzullo-v-arteta-nyappdiv-2026.