People ex rel. Perez v. Cunningham

73 A.D.3d 1307, 901 N.Y.S.2d 875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J), entered June 30, 2009 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

[1308]*1308Petitioner’s claim on this appeal, like the ones asserted in People ex rel. Germenis v Cunningham (73 AD3d 1297 [2010] [decided herewith]) and People ex rel. St. Pierre v Cunningham (73 AD3d 1310 [2010] [decided herewith]), sounds in breach of contract and is based upon the provisions of form 3617 of the Department of Correctional Services. For the reasons set forth in People ex rel. Germenis v Cunningham (supra) and People ex rel. St. Pierre v Cunningham (supra), we find petitioner’s breach of contract claim to be unavailing.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Perez v. Cunningham, 73 A.D.3d 1307, 901 N.Y.S.2d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 1307 (People ex rel. Perez v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. MacKenzie v. Cunningham
78 A.D.3d 1434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)