People ex rel. Palmer v. Dzurenda

2021 NY Slip Op 00380, 136 N.Y.S.3d 774, 190 A.D.3d 900
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2021
Docket2020-07858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00380 (People ex rel. Palmer v. Dzurenda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Palmer v. Dzurenda, 2021 NY Slip Op 00380, 136 N.Y.S.3d 774, 190 A.D.3d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People ex rel. Palmer v Dzurenda (2021 NY Slip Op 00380)
People ex rel. Palmer v Dzurenda
2021 NY Slip Op 00380
Decided on January 22, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 22, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2020-07858 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Avery Palmer, petitioner,

v

James Dzurenda, etc., respondent.


Avery Palmer, East Meadow, NY, petitioner pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Matthew Perry of counsel), for respondent.



Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Avery Palmer upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Nassau County Indictment No. 566/2020. Application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The bail determination of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

DILLON, J.P., LASALLE, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McBride v. City of New York
2022 NY Slip Op 04909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00380, 136 N.Y.S.3d 774, 190 A.D.3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-palmer-v-dzurenda-nyappdiv-2021.