People ex rel. Pahl v. Hagerty

261 A.D. 1049, 26 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 1049 (People ex rel. Pahl v. Hagerty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Pahl v. Hagerty, 261 A.D. 1049, 26 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Case held and decision reserved and matter remanded to the Special Term of the Supreme Court, Erie county, to proceed in accordance with the following memorandum: The record does not contain any requisition demanding that the Governor of the State of New York surrender relator to the State of Pennsylvania. A proceeding for the rendition of relator could not be commenced except upon such requisition of the Governor of the State of Pennsylvania. (U. S. Const, art. 4, § 2; IT. S. Code, tit. 18, § 662; Matter of Adutt, 55 Fed. 376, 379; Solomon’s Case, 1 Abb. Pr. [N. S.] 347 and 348.) In this proceeding the court may examine into and pass upon the sufficiency of the papers upon which the Governor acted in issuing his warrant for the arrest of relator. (People ex rel. Higley v. Millspaw, 281 N. Y. 441, 445.) The relator claims that a requisition for his surrender to the State of Pennsylvania was not made upon the Governor of this State by the Governor of the State of Pennsylvania. The appellants claim that such requisition was made. Testimony as to this fact was not taken in the court below and we believe that such fact should be determined before we pass upon this appeal. Therefore, the matter should be remanded to the Special Term of the Supreme Court to be held in and for the county of Erie, to determine whether the papers upon which the Governor of this State acted in issuing his warrant for the arrest of relator, included a requisition of the Governor of the State of Pennsylvania, and, if necessary, take evidence with respect thereto and report the evidence and its findings to this court. All concur. (The order sustains a writ of habeas corpus and dismisses [discharges] relator from custody.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [174 Mise. 981.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Eiseman v. Sheriff of Oneida County
55 Misc. 2d 685 (New York County Courts, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 1049, 26 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-pahl-v-hagerty-nyappdiv-1941.