People ex rel. Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

People ex rel. Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Board of Supervisors

50 Cal. 282, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 143

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1875

DocketNo. 4803

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cal. 282 (People ex rel. Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Cal. 282, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 143 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

If the petition presented to the board is to be regarded as an application to reduce the valuation of the property assessed, the board, in refusing to accede to the prayer of the relator, did not exceed its jurisdiction. Its action was merely negative in its character. (C. P. R. R. Co. v. The Board of Equalization of Placer County, 43 Cal. 365.) If, however, the petition is to be regarded as an application made to the board to strike the steamships in question from [284]*284the assessment list,"as not being proper subjects of taxation, it is clear that, had the board acceded to the petition, it would have exceeded its jurisdiction. (People v. Ashbury, 46 Cal. 523.) In either view, therefore, no excess of jurisdiction appears, and in either view the writ must be dismissed. We have been urged by counsel to determine upon the merits of the question intended to be presented in the case, whether steamships registered in the port of New York, owned by a corporation created by the laws of the State of New York, and having its habitat and place of business there, are the- subject of taxation under the revenue laws of this State. But as under the views already announced the writ must be dismissed, the expression of an opinion by us upon the question referred to becomes unnecessary.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

If the petition presented to the board is to be regarded as an application to reduce the valuation of the property assessed, the board, in refusing to accede to the prayer of the relator, did not exceed its jurisdiction. Its action was merely negative in its character. (C. P. R. R. Co. v. The Board of Equalization of Placer County, 43 Cal. 365.) If, however, the petition is to be regarded as an application made to the board to strike the steamships in question from [284]*284the assessment list,"as not being proper subjects of taxation, it is clear that, had the board acceded to the petition, it would have exceeded its jurisdiction. (People v. Ashbury, 46 Cal. 523.) In either view, therefore, no excess of jurisdiction appears, and in either view the writ must be dismissed. We have been urged by counsel to determine upon the merits of the question intended to be presented in the case, whether steamships registered in the port of New York, owned by a corporation created by the laws of the State of New York, and having its habitat and place of business there, are the- subject of taxation under the revenue laws of this State. But as under the views already announced the writ must be dismissed, the expression of an opinion by us upon the question referred to becomes unnecessary.

Writ dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cal. 282, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-pacific-mail-steamship-co-v-board-of-supervisors-cal-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack