People ex rel. Pacheco v. Reilly

297 A.D.2d 326, 746 N.Y.2d 269, 746 N.Y.S.2d 269, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922

This text of 297 A.D.2d 326 (People ex rel. Pacheco v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Pacheco v. Reilly, 297 A.D.2d 326, 746 N.Y.2d 269, 746 N.Y.S.2d 269, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the County Court, Nassau County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 326, 746 N.Y.2d 269, 746 N.Y.S.2d 269, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-pacheco-v-reilly-nyappdiv-2002.