People ex rel. Outlaw v. Murphy

31 A.D.2d 569, 294 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2916

This text of 31 A.D.2d 569 (People ex rel. Outlaw v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Outlaw v. Murphy, 31 A.D.2d 569, 294 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court dismissing a writ of habeas corpus, after a hearing, affirmed, without costs. Special Term correctly found that relator had shown no violation of any constitutional or statutory right, that his commitment was voluntary and that the rehabilitation center to which he was committed was not, in fact, a correctional institution. (People ex rel. Gordon v. Murphy, 30 A D 2d 358, affg. 55 Mise 2d 275; People ex rel. Rivera v. Murphy, 30 A D 2d 900; Schmerber v. State of California, 384 U. S. 757.) Relator was in custody upon a charge of crime and Matter of James (22 N Y 2d 545) is not in point. Relator’s additional contentions are also without merit. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmerber v. California
384 U.S. 757 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 569, 294 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-outlaw-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1968.