People ex rel. Orman v. Riley

California Supreme Court

People ex rel. Orman v. Riley

16 Cal. 186, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 203

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Cal. 186 (People ex rel. Orman v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Orman v. Riley, 16 Cal. 186, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 203 (Cal. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This is a contest for the office of Sheriff of the county of Del Norte. The judgment must he reversed, upon the ground that the special term of the Court at which the case was tried was called upon insufficient notice. The statute (Wood’s Dig. 381) requires a notice of not less than ten nor more than twenty days, and the failure to give the requisite notice in this case, renders the proceedings irregular, if not void.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This is a contest for the office of Sheriff of the county of Del Norte. The judgment must he reversed, upon the ground that the special term of the Court at which the case was tried was called upon insufficient notice. The statute (Wood’s Dig. 381) requires a notice of not less than ten nor more than twenty days, and the failure to give the requisite notice in this case, renders the proceedings irregular, if not void.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Cal. 186, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-orman-v-riley-cal-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack