People ex rel. O'Gara v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

People ex rel. O'Gara v. Superior Court

218 Cal. 178

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 22, 1933

DocketS. F. No. 14913

StatusPublished

This text of 218 Cal. 178 (People ex rel. O'Gara v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. O'Gara v. Superior Court, 218 Cal. 178 (Cal. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The application for an alternative writ of mandate is denied on the ground that John O’Gara, [179]*179the purported relator herein, is, in the opinion of the court, without capacity to commence this proceeding on behalf of the People of the state of California, without the consent of the attorney-general, and that this present proceeding must, therefore, fail for want of a proper party plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The application for an alternative writ of mandate is denied on the ground that John O’Gara, [179]*179the purported relator herein, is, in the opinion of the court, without capacity to commence this proceeding on behalf of the People of the state of California, without the consent of the attorney-general, and that this present proceeding must, therefore, fail for want of a proper party plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 Cal. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ogara-v-superior-court-cal-1933.