People ex rel. Odom v. Romano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Odom v. Romano

93 A.D.2d 828, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.2d 828 (People ex rel. Odom v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Odom v. Romano, 93 A.D.2d 828, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated June 18, 1981, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have reviewed the record and agree with petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. The petitioner was contacted by counsel and asked what issues he wished raised. He has failed to offer any. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated June 18, 1981, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have reviewed the record and agree with petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. The petitioner was contacted by counsel and asked what issues he wished raised. He has failed to offer any. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.2d 828, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-odom-v-romano-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack