People ex rel. O'Dea v. Delaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. O'Dea v. Delaney

241 A.D. 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 A.D. 844 (People ex rel. O'Dea v. Delaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. O'Dea v. Delaney, 241 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. We are of opinion that the prior service of the relator, followed by his resignation and a nine-year interval before re-entry into public employment, may not be counted to determine the date of his “ original appointment ” as comprehended by section 31 of the Civil Service Law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. We are of opinion that the prior service of the relator, followed by his resignation and a nine-year interval before re-entry into public employment, may not be counted to determine the date of his “ original appointment ” as comprehended by section 31 of the Civil Service Law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-odea-v-delaney-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack