People ex rel. Oddo v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Oddo v. Fay

16 A.D.2d 932, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 932 (People ex rel. Oddo v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Oddo v. Fay, 16 A.D.2d 932, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered November 1, 1961, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ and remanded relator to the custody of respondent. Relator sought his release from confinement on the ground that the action of the Board of Parole, in declaring him delinquent and returning him to prison, was unlawful. At the hearing the relator’s uncontradicted testimony was to the effect that the revocation of his parole was based on evidence obtained in the course of an illegal search and seizure. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered November 1, 1961, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ and remanded relator to the custody of respondent. Relator sought his release from confinement on the ground that the action of the Board of Parole, in declaring him delinquent and returning him to prison, was unlawful. At the hearing the relator’s uncontradicted testimony was to the effect that the revocation of his parole was based on evidence obtained in the course of an illegal search and seizure. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 932, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-oddo-v-fay-nyappdiv-1962.