People ex rel. O'Brien v. Hayes

38 Misc. 163, 16 N.Y. Crim. 516, 77 N.Y.S. 284
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, W. M., J.

Mo substantial right of the relator was invaded. He had a hearing before the magistrate on a charge of larceny. The magistrate held him to await the action of the grand jury for the crime of grand larceny; the grand jury failed to indict him. The fact that the grand jury refused to find a bill of indictment, with a memorandum that the case be sent to the Court of Special Sessions to be disposed of as petit larceny, was irregular, but its legal effect was the same as a simple refusal to find an indictment. The court of Special Sessions had jurisdiction to try the relator upon the charge of petit larceny. He is not entitled to a discharge now because the magistrate erred in sending the case to the grand jury in the first instance instead of the Court of Special Sessions, where it belonged.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. O'Brien v. Hayes, 38 Misc. 163, 16 N.Y. Crim. 516, 77 N.Y.S. 284 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

38 Misc. 163 (People ex rel. O'Brien v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perrin
170 A.D. 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)