People ex rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co.

253 A.D. 870, 1 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8980

This text of 253 A.D. 870 (People ex rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. O'Brien v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co., 253 A.D. 870, 1 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Order modified in accordance with stipulation of the respondent in open court, by striking from the first ordering paragraph the words “ and all other records and papers of said corporation,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal to either party. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Lewis, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and denial of the motion as matter of discretion founded on the relator’s motives as a competitor. (Cf. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp., 270 N. Y. 464; People ex rel. Giles v. Klauder-Weldon D. M. Co., 180 App. Div. 149; People ex rel. Lehman v. Consolidated Fire Alarm Co., 142 id. 753.) (The mandamus order directs defendant to permit an examination by relator of its books of account and other records of the corporation.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.
1 N.E.2d 967 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
People ex rel. Giles v. Klauder-Weldon Dyeing Machine Co.
180 A.D. 149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 870, 1 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-obrien-v-caldwell-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1938.