People ex rel. Nicolosi v. Jacobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Nicolosi v. Jacobson

253 A.D.2d 507, 676 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8977

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 507 (People ex rel. Nicolosi v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Nicolosi v. Jacobson, 253 A.D.2d 507, 676 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reinstate bail in the sum of $500,000 upon Queens County Indictment No. QN11729/96 and, inter alia, to release the petitioner on his own recognizance or to fix reasonable bail upon Queens County Indictment No. 1639/98.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reinstating bail on Queens County Indictment No. QN11729/96 in the sum of $500,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum as a cash bail alternative; and it is further,

Adjudged that bail be fixed on Queens County Indictment No. 1639/98 and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for that purpose.

The People failed to establish that the bail which had been set on Indictment No. QN11729/96 should be revoked under either CPL 530.60 (1) or (2) (a). Moreover, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to remand Edward O’Boyle on the second indictment where the court failed to consider the factors enumerated in CPL 510.30 (2) (a).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are academic in light of our determination, and in any event are without merit. Miller, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reinstate bail in the sum of $500,000 upon Queens County Indictment No. QN11729/96 and, inter alia, to release the petitioner on his own recognizance or to fix reasonable bail upon Queens County Indictment No. 1639/98.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reinstating bail on Queens County Indictment No. QN11729/96 in the sum of $500,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum as a cash bail alternative; and it is further,

Adjudged that bail be fixed on Queens County Indictment No. 1639/98 and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for that purpose.

The People failed to establish that the bail which had been set on Indictment No. QN11729/96 should be revoked under either CPL 530.60 (1) or (2) (a). Moreover, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to remand Edward O’Boyle on the second indictment where the court failed to consider the factors enumerated in CPL 510.30 (2) (a).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are academic in light of our determination, and in any event are without merit. Miller, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 507, 676 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-nicolosi-v-jacobson-nyappdiv-1998.