People ex rel. New York Electrical Lines Co. v. Squire

New York Court of Common Pleas

People ex rel. New York Electrical Lines Co. v. Squire

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 281

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided February 7, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The learned judge who made the order appealed from, after a careful examination of the law, denied the motion for a mandamus; and he has fully, and very clearly given his reasons therefor. See S. C., N. Y. State Rep., 633.

We have examined the questions raised by the appeal, and fully agree with him, both in the conclusions to which he has arrived, and the grounds on which such conclusions are based.

A similar application was made to Mr. Justice Freedman, in the case of the New York Electric Lines Co. v. John D. Crimmins and others and by him denied. MSS. opinion N. Y. Sup. Ct., Sp. Tm., Nov. i, 1886.

For the reasons stated in the opinions, we think the order appealed from should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The learned judge who made the order appealed from, after a careful examination of the law, denied the motion for a mandamus; and he has fully, and very clearly given his reasons therefor. See S. C., N. Y. State Rep., 633.

We have examined the questions raised by the appeal, and fully agree with him, both in the conclusions to which he has arrived, and the grounds on which such conclusions are based.

A similar application was made to Mr. Justice Freedman, in the case of the New York Electric Lines Co. v. John D. Crimmins and others and by him denied. MSS. opinion N. Y. Sup. Ct., Sp. Tm., Nov. i, 1886.

For the reasons stated in the opinions, we think the order appealed from should be affirmed.

People ex rel. New York Electrical Lines Co. v. Squire, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 281 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 281 (People ex rel. New York Electrical Lines Co. v. Squire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.